![]() ![]() Some have expressed shock at the “aggressive” tone of the letter received but that really shouldn’t be that surprising given that this is a world rife with copyright infringement and intellectual property theft – particularly in the photography world. This might come as a shock, but this golden rule also applies to the work of other people. Most photographers are adamant about this rule when it comes their photographs. We’ll end the controversy right here and now: You can’t use someone else’s intellectual property. Seuss Intellectual Property in the future without express written authorization of Dr. It details that the photographer should “cancel any scheduled photography sessions media appearances, interviews, or other promotional efforts” as well as “remove and destroy any and all promotional materials for Grinch Photo Shoots.”įurther, the photographer should “agree to never again use the Dr. Seuss Enterprises which isn’t too keen on people trading on its name brand and recognition to peddle photography services that it has neither licensed nor approved at any stage.Īn unnamed photographer that contacted PetaPixel about the situation shared the letter that was received in regards to the Grinch photoshoots. Yet, unlike Santa Claus, the Grinch is not in the public domain and is IP owned by Dr. ![]() Think of it as an inversion of the typical baby meets Santa Claus photoshoot but for fans of Dr. Seuss’ iconic, Christmas-hating character the Grinch. One trend that caught fire on social media is the idea of having a photoshoot of their children (or, often, just a baby) with Dr. from Pexels.įamilies and organizations often hire photographers to capture events or just provide photo sessions for the kiddies with Santa Claus. The Christmas holidays are pretty huge in some parts of the world for photographers and not just because of the new gear coming out. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |